Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta York v. York 22 N.Y.3d 1051

← Cases

York v. York

22 N.Y.3d 1051 Court N.Y. Decision date 2014-01-14 English

Judges Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.

Contents

Majority

p. 1051
[4 NE3d 370, 981 NYS2d 358]
Esther York, Appellant, v Joseph York, Respondent.
Decided January 14, 2014
p. 1052
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Newman & Greenberg, New York City (Richard A. Greenberg, William J. Dobie and Gustave H. Newman of counsel), for appellant.
Snitow Kanfer Holtzer & Millus, LLP, New York City (Frankly n H. Snitow of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. The order below was not an abuse of discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam.