Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta People v. Moore 24 N.Y.3d 1030

← Cases

People v. Moore

24 N.Y.3d 1030 Court N.Y. Decision date 2014-10-23 English

Judges Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 1030
[22 NE3d 1008, 998 NYS2d 140]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Moore, Appellant.
Decided October 23, 2014
p. 1031
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, Criminal Appeals Bureau, New York City (.Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Yuval Simchi-Levi of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed, defendant’s guilty plea vacated and the accusatory instrument dismissed. Defendant was charged with four counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03). At arraignment, there was a brief discussion between defense counsel, the assistant district attorney and the court concerning the terms of a disposition, which then lead to defendant’s plea and sentencing on the controlled substance counts. The court did not address defendant and defendant did not speak; nor was defendant advised of any constitutional rights he was waiving. Defendant now claims his constitutional rights were violated because the record fails to establish his plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent.

In People v Tyrell, we held that “[p]resuming waiver from a silent record is impermissible. The record must show, or there

p. 1032
must be an allegation and evidence which show, that an accused intelligently and understandingly rejected his constitutional rights. Anything less is not waiver” ( 22 NY3d 359 , 365-366 [2013] [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]). The People concede that under Tyrell defendant’s plea must be vacated and, as defendant has completed his sentence, remittal is unnecessary (see id. at 366 ).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, plea vacated and the accusatory instrument dismissed, in a memorandum.

Cases cited