Hyperlawhypertext legal database People v. Caza 24 N.Y.3d 1056

← Cases

People v. Caza

24 N.Y.3d 1056 Court N.Y. Decision date 2014-11-20 English

Judges Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 1056
[24 NE3d 593, 999 NYS2d 357]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Karen M. Caza, Appellant.
Decided November 20, 2014
p. 1057
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Martin J. McGuinness, Queensbury, for appellant.
Respondent precluded.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s argument that County Court erred in enhancing her sentence by departing from its conditional promise to make her two terms of imprisonment run concurrently is unpreserved for our review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484 , 491-493 [2008]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Cases cited