Hyperlawhypertext legal database People v. Ingram 24 N.Y.3d 1105

← Cases

People v. Ingram

24 N.Y.3d 1105 Court N.Y. Decision date 2014-12-16 English

Judges Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 1105
[26 NE3d 242, 2 NYS3d 414]
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Robert L. Ingram, Respondent.
Decided December 16, 2014
p. 1107
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (David A. Heraty of counsel), for appellant.
Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Sherry A. Chase of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The determination whether police have reasonable suspicion to justify a stop involves a mixed question of law and fact (People v Woods, 98 NY2d 627 , 628 [2002]). Where, as here, there exists record support for the Appellate Division’s resolution of this question, the issue is beyond this Court’s further review.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Cases cited