Hyperlawhypertext legal database In re Anonymous 25 N.Y.3d 1083

← Cases

In re Anonymous

25 N.Y.3d 1083 Court N.Y. Decision date 2015-06-09 English

Judges Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey. Judge Rivera dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction on the ground that the two-Justice dissent is on a question of law and supports an appeal as of right pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a).

Contents

Majority

p. 1083
[34 NE3d 51, 12 NYS3d 23]
In the Matter of Anonymous, for Admission as an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law, Appellant.
Decided June 9, 2015
p. 1084
APPEARANCES OP COUNSEL
Tarik Davis, Brooklyn, for appellant.
Maria Matos, Committee on Character and Fitness, New York City, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent is not on a question of law (see CPLR 5601 [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey. Judge Rivera dissents and votes to retain jurisdiction on the ground that the two-Justice dissent is on a question of law and supports an appeal as of right pursuant to CPLR 5601 (a).