Hyperlawhypertext legal database People v. Anthony C. 25 N.Y.3d 937

← Cases

People v. Anthony C.

25 N.Y.3d 937 Court N.Y. Decision date 2015-03-31 English

Judges Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 937
[29 NE3d 235, 6 NYS3d 226]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony C., Appellant.
Decided March 31, 2015
p. 938
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Susan Gliner of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The Appellate Division opinion does not suggest a misapprehension or misapplication of its authority to review youthful offender adjudications for abuse of discretion (CPL 720.20 [1] [a]), or under its broad interest-of-justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]; People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625 , 627 [1986]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Cases cited