Hyperlawhypertext legal database Holmes v. Business Relocation Services, Inc. 25 N.Y.3d 955

← Cases

Holmes v. Business Relocation Services, Inc.

25 N.Y.3d 955 Court N.Y. Decision date 2015-03-26 English

Judges Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

Contents

Majority

p. 955
[30 NE3d 896, 8 NYS3d 253]
Keith Holmes, Respondent, v Business Relocation Services, Inc., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. United Staffing Systems, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Decided March 26, 2015
p. 956
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP, New York City (Daniel S. Kotler of counsel), for third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Burns & Harris, New York City (Blake G. Goldfarb of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. As a matter of law, it cannot be said that Business Relocation Services, Inc., the alleged special employer, overcame the presumption of continuing general employment by “clear [ly] demonstrati [ng] . . . surrender of control by the general employer and assumption of control by the special employer” (Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553 , 557 [1991]). The Appellate Division correctly determined that issues of fact remained as to the alleged special employment relationship.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Read, Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein and Fahey concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum.

Cases cited