Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n 26 N.Y.3d 1152

← Cases

Ming Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n

26 N.Y.3d 1152 Court N.Y. Decision date 2016-02-18 English

Judges Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Contents

Majority

p. 1152
[48 NE3d 497, 28 NYS3d 355]
In the Matter of Ming Tung et al., Appellants, v China Buddhist Association et al., Respondents.
Decided February 18, 2016
p. 1153
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Alexander Palmer Kelly, New York City, for appellants.
Capell Barnett Matalón & Schoenfeld LLP, New York City CJoseph Milano of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department ( 124 AD3d 13 [2014]), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Cases cited