Majority
p. 1144[57 NE3d 1095, 37 NYS3d 58] The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nadine Panton, Appellant. Argued June 2, 2016; decided June 30, 2016
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City {Robin Nichinsky of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City {David P. Stromes of counsel), and Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx {Joseph N. Ferdenzi, Peter D. Coddington and T Charles Won of counsel), for respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre- Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post-
p. 1145
Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpre-served for our review (see People v Gonzalez, 55 NY2d 887 , 888 [1982]).
We have considered defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit.
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Cases cited
- People v. Gonzalez 55 NY2d 887 at 888 p. 1145