Hyperlawhypertext legal database Heim v. Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc. 6 N.Y.3d 886

← Cases

Heim v. Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc.

6 N.Y.3d 886 Court N.Y. Decision date 2006-05-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 886
David E. Heim et al., Appellants, v Tri-Lakes Ford Mercury, Inc., et al., Respondents.
Submitted February 21, 2006;
decided May 9, 2006

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying appellants’ motion to renew, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.