Hyperlawhypertext legal database People v. Redzeposki 7 N.Y.3d 725

← Cases

People v. Redzeposki

7 N.Y.3d 725 Court N.Y. Decision date 2006-06-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 725
[850 NE2d 1157, 818 NYS2d 182]
The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Mednan Redzeposki, Respondent.
Argued May 2, 2006;
decided June 6, 2006
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Jillian E. Wieder, Joseph N Ferdenzi and Allen H. Saperstein of counsel), for appellant.
Legal Aid Society, New York City (Ellen Dille, Steven Banks and Laura R. Johnson of counsel), for respondent.
p. 726
OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the case remitted to that Court for consideration of the facts (see CPL 470.25 [2] [d]; 470.40 [2] [b]).

“Before proceeding in defendant’s absence, the court should . . . ma[ke] inquiry and recite[ ] on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant’s absence was deliberate” (People v Brooks, 75 NY2d 898 , 899 [1990]). Here, the trial court properly inquired into defendant’s absence and reasonably determined — based on the court’s own observation as well as defense counsel’s explanation — that defendant had deliberately left the courthouse shortly before announcement of the jury verdict.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Cases cited