Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Groth v. Daimler Chrysler Corp. 9 N.Y.3d 1000

← Cases

Claim of Groth v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.

9 N.Y.3d 1000 Court N.Y. Decision date 2007-12-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1000
In the Matter of the Claim of Jeffrey Groth, Respondent, v Daimler Chrysler Corporation et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.
Submitted October 9, 2007;
decided December 18, 2007

Headnote

Reported below, 41 AD3d 1021 , 2007 NY Slip Op 77194 (U).

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or, in the alternative, leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cases cited