Majority
p. 1001In the Matter of Michael J. Lehrer et al., Appellants, v Giulio Cavallo et al., Respondents. Submitted November 13, 2007; decided December 18, 2007
Headnote
Reported below, 43 AD3d 1059 .Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that denied the motion for leave to amend the petition, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution (see Arnav Indus., Inc. Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300 , 303 n 1 [2001]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Cases cited
- Lehrer v. Cavallo 43 AD3d 1059 p. 1001
- Arnav Industries, Inc. Retirement Trust v. Brown 96 NY2d 300 at 303 p. 1001