Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta People ex rel. Boettcher v. Boettcher 25 N.Y. Crim. 301

← Cases

People ex rel. Boettcher v. Boettcher

25 N.Y. Crim. 301 Court SUPREME COURT—APP. DIVISION—FIRST DEP., Decision date 1910-12-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 301
SUPREME COURT—APP. DIVISION—FIRST DEP.,
Dec. 30, 1910.
THE PEOPLE EX REL. MARIA BOETTCHER v. OTTO BOETTCHER.
(141 App. Div. 531.)

Headnote

Cbime—Disorderly Person—Abandoning Wife.
Where a wife abandons her husband, who always has been and still is able to support her, and she is in no danger of becoming a public charge, he should not be convicted as a disorderly person.
Appeal by the defendant, Otto Boettcher, from a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in and for the county of New York, entered on the 25th day of October, 1910, affirming a judgment of a city magistrate of the city of New York convicting the defendant as a disorderly person.
William Brunner, for the appellant.
Theodore Connoly, for the respondent.

This is an appeal from an order of one of the judges of the Court of General Sessions affirming a judgment of a city magistrate convicting defendant as a disorderly person. The judgment of conviction shows that appellant was charged with and convicted of abandoning relator, his wife, and leaving her without proper means of support, so that she was liable to become a burden upon the public. The evidence before the city magistrate showed clearly that it was the wife who abandoned the husband; that the latter always had been and still was able and

p. 302
willing to support her, and that she was in no danger of becoming a public charge. The case falls precisely within the rule declared by this court in People ex rel. Demos v. Demos ( 115 App. Div. 410 ).

The order appealed from was erroneous, and both it and the judgment of conviction must be reversed.

Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Miller and Dowling, JJ.

Order and judgment reversed. Settle order on notice.

Cases cited