Bachiran v. Von Raden — 1 N.Y.S. 533

Majority

p. 533

Bachiran v. Von Raden et al.

(Supreme Court, General Term, First Department.

May 18, 1888.)

Headnote

Appeal from special term, New York county.

J. A. Dcoring, for appellants. D. S. Riddle, for respondent.

The questions involved in this case do not differ from those which were disposed of in the case of Peters v. Carleton, ante, 531, (decided herewith,) except that the clause in the deed discussed in that case does not appear in the deed mentioned in the case at bar. The same judgment should therefore be pronounced, affirming the judgment of the court below, with costs.

Bartlett and Daniels, JJ., concur.