← Cases

Catlin v. St. Paul's Church

1 N.Y.S. 808 Court N.Y. Gen. Term Decision date 1888-06-25 English

Decision Majority — Barnard, P. J. · Dissent — Dykman, J.,

Contents

Majority

p. 808
Catlin et al. v. St. Paul’s Church et al.
(Supreme Cowrt, General Term,, Second Department.
June 25, 1888.)

Headnote

Taxation—“ Collateral Tax Aot What Coepoeations ace Subject to.
A testator died leaving legacies to a church, a missionary society incorporated under the laws of New York, and a foreign corporation. In a controversy to determine the rights of the three corporations to take the legacies free from the collateral tax of 5 per cent, imposed by Laws N. Y. 1887, c. 713, § 4, on “all property which shall pass by will to any body politic or corporate other than societies, corporations, and institutions now exempted by law from taxation, ” held that, since a church is exempt only as to its buildings, lots, and furniture, under 2 Rev. St. N. Y. § 4, and both the church and the missionary society fall outside of the exemp
p. 809
tians of subd. 6, of “all stock owned by the state, or by literary or charitable institutions," and subd. 7, of “the personal estate of every incorporated company not made liable to taxation on its capital,” they are neither exempt from taxation, and are subject to the tax on their bequests; that the foreign corporationAhough exempt from taxation by its charter, is not exempted by the laws of New York, as required by the collateral inheritance law, and hence is subject to its provisions. Dykman, J., dissenting.
Case submitted upon facts.
Controversy between Julius Catlin, Jr.,- et al., executors of Stephen M. Buckingham, deceased, and the trustees of the several corporations named, to determine whether certain bequests to St. Paul’s Church, the Domestic & Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church, and Trinity College should be subjected to a tax under Laws 3ST. Y. c. 713, § 1.
Lockwood & Hill, (L. A. Lockwood, of counsel,) for trustees of Trinity College.

By the first section of chapter 713, Laws 1887, a tax of 5 per cent, is imposed upon collateral inheritances. The defendant St. Paul’s Church is a religious corporation. A legacy is given to it. Another defendant, Trinity College, is an institution of learning, chartered under the laws of Connecticut. Another defendant is a missionary society incorporated under the laws of this state. Are these three corporations to take the legacy free of the collateral tax? The words of the collateral tax law exempt all bequests and legacies “to * * * the societies, corporations, and institutions now exempted by law from taxation.” As to the church, the Revised Statutes only exempt “every building for public worship, * * * and the several lots where such buildings are situated, and the furniture belonging to each of them.” Section 4, 2 Rev. St. (Banks’ 7th Ed.) p. 982. The church does not fall within the exemption of subdivision 6 of that section: “All stocks owned by the state, or by literary or charitable institutions.” The ease shows no stock owned by the church. The section applies only to stock in state corporations,—and upon this stock the corporations were made to pay the tax to the state,—and to literary and charitable institutions. Chapter 195, Laws 1885. The church is not exempted under subdivision 7 of that chapter: “ The personal estate of every incorporated company not made liable to taxation on its capital in the fourth title of this chapter.” The fourth title, as it stood when that fourth section was drawn, contained provisions for the taxation of corporations upon their capital. If the corporation made no profit, it was exempt. 1 Rev. St. (2d Ed.) p. 404, § 9 Some corporations could commute, (section 11;) and some were exempted unless an income of 5 per cent, was made, (section 12.) Sections 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 were repealed by chap-456, 1857, and c. 654, Laws 1853; but the title still stands as one affecting corporations liable because they derive an income upon capital or otherwise. The exemption in subdivision 7 only applied to the personal property of a corporation which paid a tax on their stock, which was intended to include all their personal property. Churches were not included. The defendant church has therefore no exemption from the tax. The same conclusion must be reached in the case of the missionary society. There is no law exempting them as missionary societies; and the law (subdivisions 6 and 7 of section 4, above) gave them no exemption from a tax upon personal property outside of stocks held in state corporations. The case of Trinity College is different, in this: It is a foreign corporation, but is exempt from taxation from its charter. The charter of Connecticut has no extraterritorial force. The collateral inheritance tax must be construed with respect to the state laws giving exemption from taxation. “All corporations not exempted by law” from taxation in J une, 1887, is the test of exemption from the collateral inheritance tax. The defendant Trinity College does not come within the description. The legacies should therefore all be held subject to the tax of 5 per cent.

Dissent

p. 810
Pratt, J„ concurs.

(dissenting.) This is a controversy submitted without action upon facts which are admitted. In December, 1887,Stepen M. Buckingham, a resident of the city of Poughkeepsie, departed this life, leaving a last will and testament, by which, among other things, -he bequeathed to Trinity College, Hartford, in Connecticut, the sum of $50,000, and to the rectors, wardens, and vestrymen of tit. Paul’s Protestant Episcopal Church in the city of Poughkeepsie the sum of $10,000, for the purposes mentioned and specified in the will. It is admitted by the submission that the legacy in the will to Trinity College, at Hartford, Conn., was intended to be to the trustees of Trinity College, one of the defendants. Trinity College is a corporation existing under the laws of the state of Connecticut, located at Hartford, in that state. By its charter it is empowered to take by gift and devise any real and personal estate; and, by the statutes of the state of Connecticut, the property of the college is exempt from taxation; and the personal property to the, St. Paul’s Protestant Episcopal Church is also exempt from taxation by the laws of the state of New York. The questions submitted for our determination are these: First. Is the legacy of $50,000 to the trustees of Trinity College subject to a tax of 5 per cent, under chapter 713 of the Laws enacted in the year 1887? Second. Are the plaintiffs, as such executors and executrix, authorized to retain from the amount of said legacy of $50,000, 5 per cent, of said amount, and to pay the same to George W. Chase, as treasurer of Dutchess county, as and for the tax provided for in said act of 1887? Third. Is the legacy of $10,000 to the defendant the rector, wardens, and vestrymen of St. Paul's Protestant Episcopal Church in the city of Poughkeepsie subject to a tax of 5 per cent, under chapter 713 of the Laws of the state of New York enacted in 1887? Fourth. Are the plaintiffs, as such executors and executrix, authorized to retain, from the amount of said legacy of $10,000, 5 per cent, of the said amount, and to pay the same to the defendant George W. Chase, as county treasurer of Dutchess county, as and for the tax provided for in and by said act of 1887 ? And it is stipulated, if the court find and decide that the legacy of $50,000 to Trinity College is not subject to such tax, that judgment may be entered authorizing the plaintiffs as executors and executrix to pay over the full amount of said legacy to the trustees of the college; and further, if the court find and decide that the legacy of $10,000 to the rector, wardens, and vestrymen of St. Paul’s Protestant Episcopal Church in the city of Poughkeepsie is not subject to such tax of 5 per cent., that judgment may be entered authorizing the plaintiffs as executors and executrix to pay over the full amount of said legacy to the said rector, wardens, and vestrymen of St. Paul's Protestant Episcopal Church in Poughkeepsie.

By the first section of chapter 713 of the Laws of 1887, so far as the same applies to this case, all property which shall pass by will from any person who may die seized or possessed of the same while a resident of this state, to any body politic or corporate other than to the societies, corporations, and institutions now exempted by law from taxation, shall be and is subject to a tax of five dollars on every hundred dollars of such property, to be paid to the treasurer of the proper county. Our conclusion is that the Trinity College and the St. Paul’s Protestant Episcopal Church fall under the exemption from this law, specified by a body politic or corporate other than the societies and corporations and institutions now exempted by law from taxation, because the property of those corporations are exempted by law from taxation. Our determination is that the legacies of these two corporations are not subject to a tax of 5 per cent, under chapter 713 of the Laws of 1887, and that the plaintiffs as such executors and executrix are not authorized to retain from the amount of such legacies such tax, and that judgment should be entered authorizing the plaintiffs as executors to pay over the full amount of said lega

p. 811
cies to the two legatees named. The same rule applies to the legacy to the Domestic & Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America.