“Sec. 738. The defendant may, before the trial, serve upon the plaintiff’s attorney a written offer to allow judgment to be taken against him for a sum or property, or to the effect, therein specified, with costs. If there are two or more defendants, and the action can be severed, a like offer may be made by one or more defendants, against whom, a separate judgment maybe taken. If the plaintiff, within ten days thereafter, serves upon the defendant’s attorney a written notice that he accepts the offer, he may file the summons, complaint, and offer, with proof of acceptance, and thereupon the clerk must enter judgment accordingly. If notice of acceptance is not thus given, the offer cannot be given in evidence upon the trial; but, if the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment, he cannot recover costs from the time of the offer, but must pay costs from that time.” “Sec. 740. Unless an offer or an acceptance, made as prescribed in either of the last four sections, is subscribed by the party making it, his attorney must subscribe it, and annex thereto his affidavit to the effect that he is duly authorized to make it in behalf of the party.”
Wilder, Wilder & Lynch, (William J. Lynch, of counsel,) for plaintiff. Stanley, Clarke & Smith, for defendant Wiggins.
The notice cannot be regarded as sufficient offer of judgment under section 738 of the Code, for the reason that no affidavit was annexed, as required by section 740. Riggs v. Waydell, 78 N. Y. 586 . Besides, it was of no avail as such an offer, because not made more than 10 days before the trial. Herman v. Lyons, 10 Hun, 111 . There does not appear to be any provision of the Code authorizing the withdrawal of an answer except in connection with an offer of judgment. Under section 740 I think the trial fee of $30 and the clerk’s trial fee of $1 should have been allowed by the clerk. Motion granted, without costs.