Hyperlawhypertext legal database Farrell v. Baker 101 N.Y.S. 1120

← Cases

Farrell v. Baker

101 N.Y.S. 1120 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1906-10-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1120
FARRELL, Appellant, v. BAKER, Respondent. SAME, Appellant, v. HACKETT, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
October 30, 1906.)

Headnote

Actions by Edward A. Farrell against Robert Baker and Charles A. Hackett.

The determination of these appeals must abide the event of the appeal being heard today by the Court of Appeals. If the decision in the First Department is affirmed, these orders must be reversed. If that decision is reversed, these orders must be affirmed. If the Court of Appeals declines to determine the controversy on the merits, leaving the decision in the First Department undisturbed, this court will, as matter of uniformity, follow the decision of this court in its First Department. No costs. Settle order before the presiding justice. See 100 N. Y. Supp. 754 .