Hyperlawhypertext legal database Geiger v. Rosenberg 101 N.Y.S. 1122

← Cases

Geiger v. Rosenberg

101 N.Y.S. 1122 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1906-11-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1122
GEIGER, Respondent, v. ROSENBERG et al., Appellants.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 14, 1906.)

Headnote

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Ninth District. Action by Aehille Geiger against Max Rosenberg and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal. Affirmed. Nadal, Carrere & Jones, for appellants. Edward Stetson Griffing, for respondent.

The evidence of the janitor that prior to the accident he saw the hole into which the plaintiff fell was, under the circumstances, sufficient to warrant a finding of negligence by defendants. Judgment affirmed, with costs.