Hyperlawhypertext legal database George R. Read & Co. v. Orr 101 N.Y.S. 1122

← Cases

George R. Read & Co. v. Orr

101 N.Y.S. 1122 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1906-11-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1122
GEORGE R. READ & CO., Respondent, v. ORR, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 14, 1906.)

Headnote

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District. Action by George R. Read & Co. against Margaret Y. Orr. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed. David Orr, for appellant. Wentworth, Lowenstein & Stern, for respondent.

In our opinion the second action was not a judicial action or proceeding pending in a court of this state, within the meaning of these words as used in section 2, c. 516, p. 1405, Laws 1906, and therefore the law repealed was not applicable in it. As the record shows no reason for a reversal, the judgment will he affirmed, with costs.