Hyperlawhypertext legal database Handman v. Louis 102 N.Y.S. 1138

← Cases

Handman v. Louis

102 N.Y.S. 1138 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1907-02-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1138
HANDMAN et al., Appellants, v. LOUIS, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
February 4, 1907.)

Headnote

Appeal from Municipa Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fourth District Action by Simon Handman and others agair.s Joseph Louis. From a judgment of the Mu nicipal Court of the city of New York in. favo: of defendant, plarntjfih appeal. Reversed, am new trial ordered. Jacob Friedman, for appel lants. Harry M. Goldberg, for respondent.

A careful consideration o: the testimony given in this case leads us to th conclusion that the interests of justice will b best subserved by ordering a new trial. Judg ment reversed, and new trial ordered, witi costs to appellants to abide the event.