← Cases

Littner v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

105 N.Y.S. 1127 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1907-06-07 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — LAUGHLIN, J.,

Contents
p. 1127
LITTNER, Appellant, v. INTERURBAN ST. RY. CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court. Appellate Division, First Department.
June 7, 1907.)

Headnote

Action by Rose Littner, an infant, against the Intel-urban Street Railway Company. O. Horwitz, for appellant. H. G. Smyth, for respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

dissents on the ground of error in charging last two requests of counsel for defendant. LAMBERT, J., dissents on the ground of error in charging second last request.