← Cases

Does v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.

106 N.Y.S. 1122 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1907-11-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1122
DOES v. CROSSTOWN ST. RY. CO. et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
November 13, 1907.)

Headnote

Action by John J. Does, an infant, etc., against the Crosstown Street Railway Company and ¡another. 1

That part of the order granting a new trial to the defendant railway company is affirmed, with costs to the railway company against the plaintiff to abide the event. The judgment against the defendant, Rudolph, and that part of the order denying his motion

p. 1123
for a new trial, are reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the defendant Rudolph against the plaintiff to abide the event, upon the authority of Bamberg v. International Railway Company et al., 105 N. Y. Supp. 621 .