Majority
p. 1135LUSK, Respondent, v. LEE et ah, Appellants. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. November 27, 1907.)
Headnote
Action by Fred Lusk against Fred Lee and another.Orders affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Held that under the circumstances of this case it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in denying the motions.
SPRING and ROBSON, JJ., dissent.