Hyperlawhypertext legal database Epstein v. Palestine Hebrew Wine Co. 109 N.Y.S. 1129

← Cases

Epstein v. Palestine Hebrew Wine Co.

109 N.Y.S. 1129 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1908-03-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1129
EPSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. PALESTINE HEBREW WINE CO., Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
March 20, 1908.)

Headnote

Appeal from Special Term. Suit for an injunction by Elias Wolf-Levine Epstein and others, doing business under the name of Camel Wine Company, against the Palestine Hebrew Wine Company. From an order denying the injunction, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
Walter F. Rogers, for appellants. Morris R. Gossett, for respondent.

Without expressing any opinion upon the merits, and leaving the questions of fact as to the right of the plaintiff to relief to be determined by the trial judge upon the trial of the action, we think the order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.