Majority
Headnote
1. Charities—Officers of Charitable Institutions—Statutory Provisions —Rome State Custodial Asylum—Treasurer.By chapter 239, p. 524, Laws 1903, amending section 17 of the "State Finance Law” (Laws 1897, p. 34-3, c. 413), it is provided that:
“The State Comptroller and the president of the State Board of Charities shall from time to time classify Into grades the officers and employes of the various charitable and reformatory institutions required by law to report to the fiscal supervisor and in- the month of September of each year recommend to the Governor such changes in the salaries or wages of such officers or employes for the ensuing fiscal year as may seem proper, but such changes shall not be made unless the Governor shall approve the same in writing.”
Under the above provision this proceeding is instituted by the appellant, who claims to be the treasurer of the Rome State Custodial Asylum. He was appointed such treasurer in the year 1902 by the board of managers of said asylum, who also fixed his salary at $1,200 a year. He has- given a bond as such treasurer, has performed the duties appertaining to such office, and for two years, and until January, 1905, received said compensation from the state. Since the latter date he has-been unable to receive compensation because the respondents have refused to classify him into a grade. Their reason for such refusal is-that there is no statutory provision for a treasurer of said asylum or for any salary therefor. It also appears that of 17 institutions reporting to the state fiscal supervisor but one, the Craig Colony for Epileptics, has a treasurer who receives compensation, and that compensation is made to him for the reason that the statute makes special provision that his salary shall be fixed at not exceeding $1,500 a year; that the duties of treasurer of said institutions are ordinarily performed by some member of the board of managers without compensation. Both the fiscal supervisor of state charities and the respondents further take the position that there is no occasion for a salaried treasurer of this institution, for the reason that adequate provision is otherwise made for the financial branch thereof.
The question presented for our determination is whether the statute creates or contemplates the creation of the office or position of treasurer of said asylum as a distinct office or position, for the performance of the duties of which the person performing such duties may demand compensation from the state. The “Oneida State Custodial Asylum” was created by chapter 348, p. 691, Laws 1893. It was therein provided that said asylum should be governed by a board of three trustees, who should appoint a superintendent, and that said superintendent, should, in addition to other specified duties, also act as treasurer and clerk of said board, and give a bond for the faithful performance of his duties in such sum and with such sureties as the State Comptroller should prescribe. Chapter 382, p. 806, Laws 1894, changed the name of said institution to its present name, the “Rome State Custodial Asylum,” and provided that the trustees should appoint a superintendent
It is true that article 3 of the state charities law provides for reports by treasurers of the state charitable institutions, and otherwise makes reference to such treasurers. But this means the treasurers specifically created by statute and in the case of the Rome Asylum the person who performs the corresponding functions of a treasurer. Some one, of course, must perform the duties which are ordinarily comprehended within the idea conveyed by the term “treasurer.” But such duties in the case of the Rome Asylum must be performed by the managers or superintendent. The statute excludes the idea of the office of treasurer as a distinct and generic office. There is no authority, therefore, for the respondents to classify such office into a grade as the appellant seeks to require them to do. His appointment by resolution or by-law of the board of managers, being without statutory authority, does not vest him with any office, or give him any claim for compensation against the state. Section 93 of the state charities law makes the super
The order should be affirmed, with costs.