Dike v. Kilbourn

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed on the exceptions, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Held, that it was a question of fact for the jury whether defendant obtained or held possession of the premises in question Under or by virtue of any valid agreement with the plaintiff; and, also whether the agreement or consent were invalid by reason of fraud, want of capacity in plaintiff, or want of delivery or consideration therefor.