Majority
p. 539DIEPENBROCK v. WOVE REALTY CO. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. October 16, 1908.) Argued before WOODWARD, JENKS, HOOKER, GAYNOR, and RICH, JJ.
Headnote
Appeal from Trial Term, Nassau County.Action by Erwina Diepenbroek against the Wove Realty Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
Reversed.
Frederick Hulse, for appellant.
James P. Niemann, for respondent.
This case was tried with that of Clotilde R. Keller v. Wove Realty Co., 112 N. Y. Supp. 538 , and shares the same fate. My opinion is for reversal.
Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted; costs to abide the event. All concur.