Majority
p. 1146SENGEL, Appellant, v. DOREMUS et al., Respondents. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. November 27, 1908.)
Action by Emilia Sengel against Kathryne G. Doremus and others. No opinion. There has been nothing to prevent the plaintiff from having the premises readvertised, as directed in the order. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.