Hyperlawhypertext legal database Alexander v. Mosaic Tile Co. 113 N.Y.S. 265

← Cases

Alexander v. Mosaic Tile Co.

113 N.Y.S. 265 Court N.Y. Sup. Ct. Decision date 1908-11-28 English

Delivered by DAYTON, J.

Contents

Majority

p. 265
ALEXANDER et al. v. MOSAIC TILE CO.
(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.
November 28, 1908.)

Headnote

Action by Elmer E. Alexander and others, under the firm name and style of Davis, Reid & Alexander, against the Mosaic Tile "Company.
Demurrers to defenses and counterclaims sustained, with leave to plead anew.
Esselstyn & Ketchem, for plaintiffs.
Hammer & Hammer, for defendant.

The defenses set forth herein are in substance the same as those set forth in the Trent Tile Company Case, 113 N. Y. Supp. 264 , and the decision therein made will control the demurrers to the four causes of action. The first counterclaim, though pleaded in somewhat different form, is in substance the same cause of action set up in the first counterclaim in the Trent Company Case. The second counterclaim is the same as the third counterclaim in the Trent Company Case. The third counterclaim is the same as the second in the Encaustic Tiling Company Case, 113 N. Y. Supp. 261 .

For the reasons set forth in those two cases, the demurrers will be sustained in all respects, with leave to defendant to plead anew upon the usual terms.