Hyperlawhypertext legal database Bellas, Hess & Co. v. Livingston 113 N.Y.S. 544

← Cases

Bellas, Hess & Co. v. Livingston

113 N.Y.S. 544 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1908-12-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 544
BELLAS, HESS & CO. v. LIVINGSTON.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
December 16, 1908.)

Headnote

Courts (§ 190[1] )—Municipal Courts—Appeal—Interlocutory Orders.
An appeal will not lie from a Municipal Court order granting a motion to vacate an attachment.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Dec. Dig. § 190.*]
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District.
Action by Bellas, Hess & Co. against William Livingston, doing business as William Livingston & Co. From a Municipal Court order granting defendant’s motion to set aside an attachment, plaintiff apperils
Dismissed
Argued before GIEGERICH, HENDRICK, and FORD, JJ.
Falck & Westerfield (Albert Falck, of counsel), for appellant.
Marcuson Bros. (A. S. Marcuson, of counsel), for respondent.

The plaintiff seeks to appeal from an order of the Municipal Court granting a motion to vacate an attachment, but there is no power in this court to entertain such an appeal. Maas v. Nankeville, 49 Misc. Rep. 637 , 97 N. Y. Supp. 980 , and cases there cited.

The appeal should be dismissed, with $10 costs.