Majority
p. 763BECKER v. NEW YORK TAXICAB CO. (Supreme Court, Appellate Term. January 21, 1910.) Argued before GIEGERICH, DAYTON, and LEHMAN, JJ.
Headnote
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.Action by Michael Becker against the New York Taxicab Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Isidor Cohn, for appellant.
Lewis D. Mooney, for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
(dissenting). Plaintiff’s testimony was corroborated by a police officer. Defendant’s chauffeur, an interested witness, gave
Dissent
p. 764
the only testimony for defendant. His evidence is far from convincing. Plaintiff sustained the burden of proof.
The judgment for defendant was error, and should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.