Majority
Headnote
1. Injunction (§ 2[1] )—Civil Rights—Use of Person’s Name or Picture.This is an application for a temporary injunction to restrain the defendants from publishing, selling, circulating, or' dis
The plaintiff concedes that the relief which he now seeks could not have been granted prior to the enactment of chapter 14 of the Laws of 1909, which is now incorporated in sections 50 and 51 of the civil rights law (Consol. Laws, c. 6). This statute authorizes one to prevent or restrain the use of his name or picture by another “for advertising purposes or for the purposes of trade” without the written consent of such person. The statute has been held to be constitutional (Rhodes v. Sperry & Hutchinson, 193 N. Y. 223 , 85 N. E. 1097 , 127 Am. St. Rep. 945 ), and creates a personal right, which was not recognized independent of statute (Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co., 171 N. Y. 538 , 64 N. E. 442 , 59 L. R. A. 478 , 89 Am. St. Rep. 828 ). The act of the defendants in printing the plaintiff’s name upon the publications referred to was a use of the plaintiff’s name for the purpose of trade. It was evidently placed upon the publication by the defendants because, in their opinion, its presence upon these books would facilitate their sale. I do not think that it can be seriously questioned that the plaintiff’s name is being used by the defendants for a trade purpose.
The defendants attempt to justify their action in using the plaintiff’s name by the claim that the books “The White Mustang” and “In the Apache Country” were dedicated to the public in the absence of a copyright, and that any person has the right to republish them under the true name of the author. The plaintiff does not question the defendant’s right to publish the books in the manner in which he dedicated them to the public; but I think that he has the right to the protection of the statute in order to prevent his own name being used in connection with them for trade purposes without his consent. The statute gives him the right to protection against such a use of his name without his consent, and he has done nothing to relinquish or forfeit this right.
Motion granted. Settle order on notice.
Cases cited
- Rhodes v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co. 193 N. Y. 223 p. 439
- Roberson v. Rochester Folding Box Co. 171 N. Y. 538 p. 439