Hyperlawhypertext legal database Caminez v. Sussman Bros. 123 N.Y.S. 1109

← Cases

Caminez v. Sussman Bros.

123 N.Y.S. 1109 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1910-05-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1109
CAMINEZ, Respondent, v. SUSSMAN BROS. & CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
May 6, 1910.)

Headnote

Action by Jacob Caminez against Sussman Bros. & Co.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the answer raises an issue as to the presentation and notice of dishonor of the check in suit, and judgment upon the pleadings should not have been directed. Cassell v. Regierer, 114 N. Y. Supp. 601 . The failure to obtain an order directing the issues to be tried was waived by the plaintiff. Tautphœus v. Harbor & Suburban B. & S. Association, 96 App. Div. 23 , 88 N. Y. Supp. 709 ; Blenderman v. Bellis Co., 64 Misc. Rep. 65 , 117 N. Y. Supp. 897 . The appeal from the order denying the motion to set aside the judgment is "dismissed, without costs.