Hyperlawhypertext legal database Chapman v. L. E Waterman Co. 123 N.Y.S. 1110

← Cases

Chapman v. L. E Waterman Co.

123 N.Y.S. 1110 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1910-05-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1110
CHAPMAN et al. v. L. E WATERMAN CO.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
May 20, 1910.)

Headnote

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by Isaac B. Chapman and another against the L. E. Waterman Company. From a judgment for defendant, and an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
Alexander S. Bacon, for appellants.
Samuel S. Watson, for respondent.

Without passing upon the right of the plaintiff to a permanent injunction, we think, upon the record as it stands, that the court was justified in refusing to grant a temporary injunction, leaving it to the court upon the trial to give such judgment as the evidence would justify. Order affirmed, wit’ll $10 costs and disbursements.