Hyperlawhypertext legal database Goldblum v. Mayor, Lane & Co. 123 N.Y.S. 1117

← Cases

Goldblum v. Mayor, Lane & Co.

123 N.Y.S. 1117 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1910-06-10 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1117
GOLDBLUM, Respondent, v. MAYOR, LANE & CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 10, 1910.)

Headnote

Action by Joseph Goldblum against Mayor, Lane & Go.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on account of confusing and inconsistent rulings with regard to plaintiff’s suffering from pleurisy. If plaintiff desires to recover for pleurisy, he should ask to amend his complaint.