Majority
p. 1119HATTEN, Respondent, v. HYDE-McFARLIN CO., Appellant. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. March 29, 1910.)
Headnote
Action by John Hatten against the Hyde-McFarlin Company.Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
McLennan, P. j., and WILLIAMS, J., dissent, upon the ground that at the time of the accident the plaintiff was not engaged in the work of the defendant.