Hyperlawhypertext legal database Potter v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad 125 N.Y.S. 1140

← Cases

Potter v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

125 N.Y.S. 1140 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1910-11-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1140
POTTER, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
November 15, 1910.)

Headnote

Action by Erastus D. Potter against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See opinion by SPRING, J., on former appeal in same case, reported at 134 App. Div. 827 , 119 N. Y. Supp. 150 .

McLennan, P. J., and ROBSON, J., dissent upon the ground that the evidence fails to establish any further duty of defendant as to giving signals at the crossing in question than that required at the ordinary farm crossing.