p. 1123BROOKS v. CITY OF ROCHESTER. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department. November 30, 1910.)
Headnote
Action by Sarah Brooks against the City of Rochester, xPlaintiff’s exception sus- ( iained, and motion for new trial granted, with \ costs to plaintiff to abide event. Held, that '¡the questions of defendant’s negligence and of ¡plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence i were, questions of fact, which should have been ¡submitted to the jury.
dissents, upon the ground of contributory negligence.