Hyperlawhypertext legal database Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co. 126 N.Y.S. 1129

← Cases

Friedman v. James F. Scholes Co.

126 N.Y.S. 1129 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1910-12-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1129
FRIEDMAN, Respondent, v. JAMES F. SCHOLES CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
De
p. 1130
cember 2, T910.)

Headnote

Action by Jacob J. Friedman against the James F. Scholes Company.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that at the time of the injury to plaintiff Kroger must be deemed to be the servant of the American Sugar Refining Company, and hot of defendant. Baldwin v. Abraham, 57 App. Div. 67 , 67 N. Y. Supp. 1079 , affirmed 171 N. Y. 677 , 64 N. E. 1118 ; Howard v. Ludwig, 57 App. Div. 94 , 67 N. Y. Supp. 1095 , affirmed 171 N. Y. 507 , 64 N. E. 172 ; Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation, 128 App. Div. 214 , 112 N. Y. Supp. 566 ; McCarthy, v. McCabe, 131 App. Div. 396 , 115 N. Y. Supp. 829 ; Muldoon v. City Fireproofing Co., 134 App. Div. 453 , 456, 119 N. Y. Supp. 320 ; Kellogg v. Church Charity Foundation, 135 App. Div. 839 , 120 N. Y. Supp. 406 .

Cases cited