← Cases

Ketcham v. Neuman

126 N.Y.S. 1133 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1910-12-30 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1133
KETCHAM, Appellant, v. NEUMAN, Respondent.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
December 30, 1910.)

Headnote

Ac
p. 1134
tion by Henry I>. Ketcham against Emanuel Neuman.
L. M. Isaacs, for appellant. B. G. Paskus, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the. verdict was excessive, without determining now what deductions, if any, the defendant was entitled to. Order filed.