← Cases

Borough Bank v. McLaughlin

129 N.Y.S. 1114 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1911-06-09 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — BURR, J.,

Contents
p. 1114
BOROUGH BANK OF BROOKLYN, Respondent, v. McLAUGHLIN, Appellant, et al.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
June 9, 1911.)

Headnote

Action by the Borough Bank of Brooklyn against Edward J. McLaughlin, impleaded with others.

No sufficient reason appears why the officers of the plaintiff should not be examined before trial. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and order for examination reinstated.

dissents, solely upon the ground that the testimony sought would be inadmissible upon the trial. Jamestown Business College Association v. Allen, 172 N. Y. 291 , 64 N. E. 952 , 92 Am. St. Rep. 740 ,

Cases cited