Hyperlawhypertext legal database Waterman Bldg. Co. v. Rose 130 N.Y.S. 1134

← Cases

Waterman Bldg. Co. v. Rose

130 N.Y.S. 1134 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1911-06-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1134
WATERMAN BLDG. CO. v. ROSE.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
June 29, 1911.)

Headnote

Aupeál from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by the Waterman Building Company against Samuel B. Rose. From an order- denying'a motion to vacate an attachment, defendant appeals. Reversed.
Walter E. Godfrey, for appellant.
Watson & Raymond, for respondent.

The allegations in the affidavits upon which the warrant of attachment was granted are wholly insufficient, and’ the motion to vacate the same should have been granted. Order reversed, with costs, and motion to vacate attachment granted.