Hyperlawhypertext legal database Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Sternon 131 N.Y.S. 650

← Cases

Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Sternon

131 N.Y.S. 650 Court N.Y. App. Term Decision date 1911-11-10 English

Contents

Majority

p. 650
OSCAR SCHLEGEL MFG. CO. v. STERNON.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Term.
November 10, 1911.)

Headnote

1. Courts (§ 190*)—New York Municipal Court—Orders AppealableAmending Names oe Parties.
An order of the Municipal Court granting a motion to amend defendant’s name is not appealable.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Dec. Dig. § 190.[1] ]
2. Courts (§ 190*)—New York Municipal Court—Orders Appealable.
An order of the Municipal Court denying defendant’s motion for a re-argument is not appealable.
[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Dec. Dig. § 190.*]
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District.
Action by the Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Company against John Sternon. From orders granting a motion to amend defendant’s name and denying defendant’s motion for a reargument, defendant appeals. Appeal dismissed.
Argued before SEABURY, GUY, and COHALAN, JJ.
Strauss & Singer, for appellant.
Jacob S. Katzman, for respondent.

[1, 2] This is an appeal from an order granting the motion of the plaintiff to amend the name of the defendant, and also from an order denying defendant’s motion for a reargument. Neither of these orders is appealable. Lyons v. Mulvihill, 128 N. Y. Supp. 653 .

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.