Hyperlawhypertext legal database Dixon v. Snook 133 N.Y.S. 1118

← Cases

Dixon v. Snook

133 N.Y.S. 1118 Court N.Y. App. Div. English

Contents

Majority

p. 1118
DIXON, Respondent, v. SNOOK, Appellant. MAHANNA, Appellant, v. PHILIPS, Respondent. OTIS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.
October, 1911.)

Headnote

Actions by Charles Dixon against Cortland Snook, by Jane Mahanna against Frank Philips, and by James S. Otis against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

No opinions. The foregoing cases, having been twice reached in their regular order upon the calendar, and twice passed, are dismissed, under general rule 39. See, also, 65 Misc. Rep. 166 , 119 N. Y. Supp. 360 ; 131 N. Y. Supp. 1127 .

Cases cited