Hyperlawhypertext legal database Laarson v. Cameron 133 N.Y.S. 1129

← Cases

Laarson v. Cameron

133 N.Y.S. 1129 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1912-03-01 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — BURR, J.,

Contents
p. 1129
LAARSON, Respondent, v. CAMERON, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.
March 1, 1912.)

Headnote

Action by Selma Laarson, as administratrix, etc., against Julia E. Cameron.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

dissents, upon the ground that a finding that other and different appliances than those furnished by defendant for shifting belts were in common and general use in connection with such machinery as was here employed is against the weight of the evidence, and upon the further ground that plaintiff’s intestate assumed the risk of the employment.