Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hovey v. Richardson 133 N.Y.S. 33

← Cases

Hovey v. Richardson

133 N.Y.S. 33 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1911-12-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 33
(147 App. Div. 892.)
HOVEY v. RICHARDSON.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
December 29, 1911.)

Headnote

Appeal from Appellate Term.
Action by Le Roy F. Hovey against Thomas D. Richardson, Jr. From a determination of the Appellate Term reversing a judgment of the Municipal Court for defendant, he, by permission, appeals.
Determination of Appellate ■Term affirmed.
Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and LAUGHLIN, CLARKE, SCOTT, and MILLER, JJ.
Charles E. Rushmore, for appellant.
L. S. Kafer, for respondent.

For the reasons stated in the prevailing opinion herewith handed down in Hovey v. De Long Hook & Eye Company, 133 N. Y, Supp. 25 , the determination of the Appellate Term should be affirmed, with costs.

MILLER and SCOTT, JJ., dissenting.