Hyperlawhypertext legal database Rycroft v. Pierce 135 N.Y.S. 1140

← Cases

Rycroft v. Pierce

135 N.Y.S. 1140 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1912-05-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1140
RYCROFT v. PIERCE.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
May 31, 1912.)

Headnote

Action by Alice O. Rycroft against Henry O. Pierce.

Order ( 135 N. Y. Supp. 447 ) resettled, by adding to it the following clause: “Without prejudice to an application at Special Term for leave to renew the motion to open the default, upon satisfactory proof that the defendant was unable to come to New York to be present at the trial of the case, and that he has a defense on the merits.”