Hyperlawhypertext legal database McElroy v. Goldstein 138 N.Y.S. 1127

← Cases

McElroy v. Goldstein

138 N.Y.S. 1127 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1912-11-29 English

Decision Majority — PER CURIAM. · Dissent — LAUGHLIN, J.,

Contents
p. 1127
McELROY, Respondent, v. GOLDSTEIN, Appellant.
(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.
November 29, 1912.)

Headnote

Action by Robert L. McElroy against Albert Gold-stein.
A. Van Wyck, of New York City, for appellant.
M. Conboy, of New York City, for respondent.

Judgment modified, as stated in order, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff. Order filed. See, also, 151 App. Div. 936 , 135 N. Y. Supp. 1125 .

dissents, on the ground that in his opinion there was a failure of consideration.