Majority
p. 1142SHAW v. SHAW et al. (Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department. December 30, 1912.)
Headnote
Action by Gertrude D. Shaw against William Barrett Shaw and another,This order is affirmed, for the reason that there is an interlocutory judgment herein; but.the affirmance is not upon the merits, and is without prejudice to an application to the Special Term to set aside, or to vacate, or to open the interlocutory judgment, or the final judgment, if it has been entered herein, and for the relief sought for by this motion. Order affirmed, without costs.